
Rewards Distributed
280867 ANSR
Total
Questions
63,807
Total
Answers
15,086
Total
Users
36,998
Join now and start earning by posting answers.
May 17, 2022
The question of the use of drones in combat is mainly moral. As in the days of chivalry, which had a code of honor in combat that the enemy did not respect with bows and crossbows.
We also make the parallel with the samurai and their bushido (way of the warrior) which was a moral code of the warriors facing invaders who had very different methods although effective.
In the end, he will be the big winner who will decide the answer according to his point of view on the question.
But if you want to know more, its gonna be long:
So the judgment on the use of drones would be the same type of debate? A duel between two methods, two codes between combatants?
No. Because this change of method means that there are no more human aggressors, only victims.
We have to go back to the time of the first massive use of "anti-tank / anti-personnel mines" to talk about this method / moral duality. (Although it is unclear who the first mine user is because of the many traces throughout history)
Indeed mines are the first "autonomous" weapons. Can be installed anywhere, by anyone. Injuring and dying without putting themselves in danger.
May 26, 2023
May 17, 2022
The question of the use of drones in combat is mainly moral. As in the days of chivalry, which had a code of honor in combat that the enemy did not respect with bows and crossbows.
We also make the parallel with the samurai and their bushido (way of the warrior) which was a moral code of the warriors facing invaders who had very different methods although effective.
In the end, he will be the big winner who will decide the answer according to his point of view on the question.
But if you want to know more, its gonna be long:
So the judgment on the use of drones would be the same type of debate? A duel between two methods, two codes between combatants?
No. Because this change of method means that there are no more human aggressors, only victims.
We have to go back to the time of the first massive use of "anti-tank / anti-personnel mines" to talk about this method / moral duality. (Although it is unclear who the first mine user is because of the many traces throughout history)
Indeed mines are the first "autonomous" weapons. Can be installed anywhere, by anyone. Injuring and dying without putting themselves in danger.
Tip